CA/Audit Statements: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
fixed typos
m (formatting to clarify steps)
m (fixed typos)
Line 159: Line 159:
# The ability to conduct an audit that addresses the criteria specified in an Eligible Audit Scheme (see Section 8.1);
# The ability to conduct an audit that addresses the criteria specified in an Eligible Audit Scheme (see Section 8.1);
# Employs individuals who have proficiency in examining Public Key Infrastructure technology, information security tools and techniques, information technology and security auditing, and the third-party attestation function;
# Employs individuals who have proficiency in examining Public Key Infrastructure technology, information security tools and techniques, information technology and security auditing, and the third-party attestation function;
# (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI standards) accredited in accordance with ISO 17065 applying the requirements specified in ETSI EN 319 403;  
# (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI standards) accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17065 applying the requirements specified in ETSI EN 319 403;  
# (For audits conducted in accordance with the WebTrust standard) licensed by WebTrust;
# (For audits conducted in accordance with the WebTrust standard) licensed by WebTrust;
# Bound by law, government regulation, or professional code of ethics; and
# Bound by law, government regulation, or professional code of ethics; and
Line 185: Line 185:
** The CABs accreditation documentation explicitly refers to all of the following:
** The CABs accreditation documentation explicitly refers to all of the following:
*** ETSI EN 319 403  
*** ETSI EN 319 403  
**** as the relevant standard for the CAB to perform ETSI audits, allocated under ISO 17065 as framing standard.  
**** as the relevant standard for the CAB to perform ETSI audits, allocated under ISO/IEC 17065 as framing standard.  
**** The EU eIDAS Regulation 910/2014 can be listed to supplement that information but – alone – is not sufficient to demonstrate ETSI auditors qualification.  
**** The EU eIDAS Regulation 910/2014 can be listed to supplement that information but – alone – is not sufficient to demonstrate ETSI auditors qualification.  
*** ETSI EN 319 401 and ETSI EN 319 411-1
*** ETSI EN 319 401 and ETSI EN 319 411-1
Line 197: Line 197:
* Require the ETSI auditor to provide a comprehensive written explanation about why they are not conformant with the above mentioned scheme. The auditor must provide a rationale clearly referring back to all of the following:  
* Require the ETSI auditor to provide a comprehensive written explanation about why they are not conformant with the above mentioned scheme. The auditor must provide a rationale clearly referring back to all of the following:  
** European Accreditation to demonstrate they act under the EU accreditation scheme,
** European Accreditation to demonstrate they act under the EU accreditation scheme,
** ISO 17065 plus ETSI EN 310 403 to demonstrate they are accredited/allowed to audit publicly trusted CA/Trust Service Provider according to ETSI EN 319 401 and ETSI EN 319 411-1 and
** ISO/IEC 17065 plus ETSI EN 319 403 to demonstrate they are accredited/allowed to audit publicly trusted CA/Trust Service Provider according to ETSI EN 319 401 and ETSI EN 319 411-1 and
** ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QWACS certificates according to the EU eIDAS Regulation 910/2014.
** ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QWACS certificates according to the EU eIDAS Regulation 910/2014.
* Review the documents and explanation.
* Review the documents and explanation.
* Request external review from ACAB’c to provide opinion about the CAB's accreditation.
* Request external review from ACAB’c to provide opinion about the CAB's accreditation.
Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526

edits

Navigation menu