3
edits
SeaMonkey:Reasons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
RodWilliams (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* More control and choice to the user | * More control and choice to the user | ||
* Integrated Browser and Mail/News-Client (needs not be same process, but should work well together, share settings, etc) | * Integrated Browser and Mail/News-Client (needs not be same process, but should work well together, share settings, etc) | ||
I want an application which combines the best of FF1.5/TB 1.5 and maybe lightning. Basically an application which does everything, (BUT NOT IE) A small footprint will be helpful. RW best descibed as an end user | |||
==Chris Thomas== | ==Chris Thomas== | ||
I personally strongly prefer SeaMonkey... there are a bunch of reasons. I've used it (well, the Mozilla suite) for a few years and am more used to it, and I see more eye-to-eye with other SeaMonkey developers. | I personally strongly prefer SeaMonkey... there are a bunch of reasons. I've used it (well, the Mozilla suite) for a few years and am more used to it, and I see more eye-to-eye with other SeaMonkey developers. | ||