401
edits
Accessibility/Experiment1 feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Thoughts / Feedback
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
::: SP: yes, that was the reason there is a distinction. While there is definitely a difference between the audience of captions and subtitles and their needs, I wonder if they need a technical distinction: they are both displayed on-screen and typically in the same location. Translations can exist for both, subtitles and captions. The only reason to keep them is that there may be both, a subtitle and a caption file available in the same language. However, they should be alternatives and not additionals. So, it might make sense to somehow group them together. | ::: SP: yes, that was the reason there is a distinction. While there is definitely a difference between the audience of captions and subtitles and their needs, I wonder if they need a technical distinction: they are both displayed on-screen and typically in the same location. Translations can exist for both, subtitles and captions. The only reason to keep them is that there may be both, a subtitle and a caption file available in the same language. However, they should be alternatives and not additionals. So, it might make sense to somehow group them together. | ||
::: GF: Still, captions are not subtitles and subtitles are not captions. Even if you've got Spanish subtitles and Spanish captions, they're different because the captions will contain information that the subtitles won't. Really, the only thing they have in common is that they are text. The technical distinction can be made by identifying captions with one type of metadata and subtitles with another. Place them in different GUI menus, as well. | |||
* SP: the HTML specification could be improved by including an extra hierarchical element, such as itextlist. This allows all time-aligned text categories to be handled in the same way with itext, but provides a selection mechanism for the alternative tracks. category is a required attribute. | * SP: the HTML specification could be improved by including an extra hierarchical element, such as itextlist. This allows all time-aligned text categories to be handled in the same way with itext, but provides a selection mechanism for the alternative tracks. category is a required attribute. | ||