45
edits
Talk:Places: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Tagging: different than bookmarking
DesertEagle (talk | contribs) (Cheaper on bandwidth) |
|||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]] 19:35, 25 Feb 2006 (PST) | [[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]] 19:35, 25 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
Excellent point! I think any redesign of a bookmarking interface in current browsers needs to address exactly this problem. But, may be there is a simple solution: two different purposes require two different interfaces that serve each purpose best. Have a look at this little essay I wrote recently: http://tdot.blog-city.com/rethinking_bookmarks_ui.htm | |||
-- 19:43, 8 March 2006 -- | |||
== Cheaper on bandwidth == | == Cheaper on bandwidth == | ||
I'm glad to see firefox will be heading in this direction. Let me make a suggestion: if need be to implement server side functionality in order to keep cached bookmarks current, just remember that server hosting would benefit from this feature -and most likely jump to the aid of Firefox- since it would reduce the ammount of bandwidth they would waste unnecessarily. | I'm glad to see firefox will be heading in this direction. Let me make a suggestion: if need be to implement server side functionality in order to keep cached bookmarks current, just remember that server hosting would benefit from this feature -and most likely jump to the aid of Firefox- since it would reduce the ammount of bandwidth they would waste unnecessarily. | ||