Tree Rules/comm-central: Difference between revisions

Tree Rules/comm-central (view source)

686 bytes removed , 4 May 2010

canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

3,628

edits

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 Note: wanted and blocking bugs do '''not''' approve a patch for check in.
-Patches for approval must:
+See [[Thunderbird/Landing_Patches_on_Thunderbird3.1]] for more information about getting approval for landing patches for Thunderbird 3.1.
-* Not affect strings in mail/locales and editor/ui.
-* Land on trunk before requesting approval. Preferably to have some time baking before approval is requested.
-* Be accompanied by a risk assessment as to the risk the patch poses and the reason we need to take it for the 3.1 final release.
-Patches are unlikely to be accepted if:
-* They are not affecting security or stability (in the first couple of point releases this may be relaxed by drivers if there are fixes for significant regressions).
-* They are high risk.
-* They have no tests (some patches may be accepted without tests if there is a good reason why there aren't any, and if they can be demonstrated to be well-tested, if you need support for writing tests, please ask in #maildev).
-Please ask on #maildev if you have questions.
 === SeaMonkey ===