3
edits
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*** 2 different people using the same email address. Though if we do it right, then perhaps it won't be entirely necessary. --[[User:Standard8|Standard8]] 03:21, 8 Oct 2005 (PDT) | *** 2 different people using the same email address. Though if we do it right, then perhaps it won't be entirely necessary. --[[User:Standard8|Standard8]] 03:21, 8 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
**** Ok, this is an argument. I probably don't have one could carry out this problem about a query taken into account this case because such a fall from my circle of friends isn't known to me; -). The Address book simply likes to ask the user like him it liked... --[[User:Griffin|Griffin]] 13:53, 9 Oct 2005 (GMT+01:00) | **** Ok, this is an argument. I probably don't have one could carry out this problem about a query taken into account this case because such a fall from my circle of friends isn't known to me; -). The Address book simply likes to ask the user like him it liked... --[[User:Griffin|Griffin]] 13:53, 9 Oct 2005 (GMT+01:00) | ||
**** Please consider also some small self-help groups with an group account, where the email address (which one is it?) could be the same. Pls. think also about people/contacts with NO email address, where we would need a key consisting of the email address(es) AND the name. | |||
Does a time schedule already exist when the new address book will be completed or when you shall start with the innovations? Within 76 days is Christmas and the ideal Christmas present would be a new address book ;) --[[User:Griffin|Griffin]] 16:33, 9 Oct 2005 (GMT+01:00) | Does a time schedule already exist when the new address book will be completed or when you shall start with the innovations? Within 76 days is Christmas and the ideal Christmas present would be a new address book ;) --[[User:Griffin|Griffin]] 16:33, 9 Oct 2005 (GMT+01:00) | ||
edits