Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526
edits
NSS:FaceToFace2012: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Tuesday, August 7
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>12:30-1: | <td>12:30-1:45</td> | ||
<td>Continuation of Priorities discussion - China, Security Roadmap</td> | <td>Continuation of Priorities discussion - China, Security Roadmap</td> | ||
<td>Kai Engert, Bob Relyea, Wan-Teh Chang, Ryan Sleevi, Johnathan Nightingale, Asa Dotzler, Sid Stamm, Lucas Adamski, Brian Smith, Kathleen Wilson, Gerv Markham, Dan Veditz, Josh Aas, Eric Rescorla, Ian Melven, Camilo Viecco, David Keeler, David Dahl, Gary Kwon</td> | <td>Kai Engert, Bob Relyea, Wan-Teh Chang, Ryan Sleevi, Johnathan Nightingale, Asa Dotzler, Sid Stamm, Lucas Adamski, Brian Smith, Kathleen Wilson, Gerv Markham, Dan Veditz, Josh Aas, Eric Rescorla, Ian Melven, Camilo Viecco, David Keeler, David Dahl, Gary Kwon</td> | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>1: | <td>1:45-2:30</td> | ||
<td>Items particularly related to our CAB Forum participation | <td>Items particularly related to our CAB Forum participation | ||
* We need to firm up our "improving revocation" strategy, views and planned changes. Should we be pushing CAs to improve the CRL and OCSP infrastructure? If so, are we going to take advantage of it? What about all of these alternative mechanisms for revocation? | * We need to firm up our "improving revocation" strategy, views and planned changes. Should we be pushing CAs to improve the CRL and OCSP infrastructure? If so, are we going to take advantage of it? What about all of these alternative mechanisms for revocation? | ||