Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526
edits
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
** knowingly issues certificates without the knowledge of the entities whose information is referenced in the certificates; or | ** knowingly issues certificates without the knowledge of the entities whose information is referenced in the certificates; or | ||
** knowingly issues certificates that appear to be intended for fraudulent use. | ** knowingly issues certificates that appear to be intended for fraudulent use. | ||
* Mozilla will consider removing a root certificate from NSS if | * Mozilla will consider removing a root certificate from NSS if the CA is issuing certificates in a manner that is non-compliant with Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy. (As per the previous point, a CA that is issuing certificates that are being used in MitM attacks is non-compliant with Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy.) | ||
* SSL makes tampering visible to its victims. The certificate has to actually make it to the users client application before the user can decide to trust it. | * SSL makes tampering visible to its victims. The certificate has to actually make it to the users client application before the user can decide to trust it. | ||