Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Community:SummerOfCode07:Brainstorming

4,631 bytes removed, 20:01, 22 March 2007
Shifting across 3 ideas from myk and JPEG2000
| valign="top" |
| valign="top" |These groups can be made by user or it can be done automatically ( can be configured )<br><br>This proposal is too vague - Gerv
|-
| valign="top" | JPEG 2000
| valign="top" | [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36351 Add JPEG 2000 support to Mozilla]
| valign="top" | schapel
| valign="top" |
| valign="top" | This could be done in Gecko itself or as an Imagelib extension as described in [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18574#c672 this Bugzilla comment]<br><br>Who is using this image format? What are the benefits? - Gerv <br><br> No one at the moment. Because it is not currently supported in browsers, no one can use it. The benefit is that it could finally be used to some degree on the web. In other words, this will break the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic) Catch-22] situation that currently exists.<br><br>We tried that with MNG, and it didn't work. You need a better argument - Gerv
|-
| valing="top" | Allow the option of passing URL to helper application instead of downloading
<br><br>
Such an extension would have value if it were open source and usable with any storage backend, not just Google's - Gerv
|-| valign="top" | rich content microsummaries| valign="top" | [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341347 bug 341347]<br>[http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/06/tufte-and-graphical-microsummaries/ Tufte and Graphical Live Titles]<br>[http://wiki.mozilla.org/GraphicalMicrosummaries Graphical Microsummaries]| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | As Tufte notes, it can be very useful to pack a lot of information in a small space. Microsummaries are targeted at that kind of information presentation. But microsummaries can only display characters at the moment, which severely limits how much information they can display and how well they can display it. In fact, the most dramatically informative microsummaries (like a graph of the day's activity for a stock, or a graphical depiction of the next five day's weather) are currently impossible to implement. But if sites could provide rich content (i.e. HTML or image) microsummaries, then these would be possible.|-| valign="top" | microsummary builder| valign="top" | [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3741/ Microsummary Generator Builder extension]| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | For sites that don't provide microsummaries, it's useful to be able to extract your own. But building one from scratch requires knowledge of XSLT, XPath, and other technologies that even computer-savvy users and software engineers may lack. And even for folks who do have that knowledge, it's much harder than it should be to extract a microsummary from a web page. Tools could significant improve this situation, and [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3741/ one such tool] is already available, but there's still a lot more that can be done in two directions: for regular users, we could have a tool that made extracting a microsummary super-simple. In fact, it could start as simple as clicking an element on a web page and dragging it to the bookmarks toolbar. We could then build on that basic functionality with additional simple mechanisms for massaging the information to be summarized. For developers, we could have a tool that couples those simple mechanisms for average users with more sophisticated functions for inspecting and manipulating the microsummary generator. For example, we might provide an editable "source" view of the generator. And we might enable more complicated UI gestures for things like anchoring an XPath that retrieves some informatino to a non-root node (f.e. to the node that labels that information, whose relationship to the information is less likely to change over time than the relationship of that information node to the root node).|-| valign="top" | microsummary generator web service| valign="top" | [http://userstyles.org/livetitle User Styles' Live Titles repository]| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | MykMelez| valign="top" | userstyles.org has set up a repository for microsummary generators, which is a great first step in distributing the generators, but it would be much more useful if users didn't have to browse the repository and install a generator to use it on a site. Imagine an extension (or an enhancement to an extension like [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3639/ Microsummary Buddy] or [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4248/ Microsummary Manager]) that automatically notifies users when a generator is available for a page they're browsing and shows them the microsummary it generates. Then, if users decide they want to use the microrsummary, the extension installs the generator automatically and creates the microsummary-enabled bookmark for the user. And all the user has to do is something simple like clicking on the "microsummary available" notification icon or dragging it to the bookmarks toolbar.}
Accountapprovers, antispam, confirm, emeritus
4,925
edits

Navigation menu