Confirmed users
99
edits
GavinSharp (talk | contribs) |
(add thumbnailing service/bug 899401) |
||
| Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
A first draft of the new API has been created. Asaf is going to create a first mock of the service and verify consumers requirements with it. Marco will work on the database schema and performances. Consumers conversion may take the most time and will likely be an iterative process once the API and the service are complete, by the end of the third quarter. | A first draft of the new API has been created. Asaf is going to create a first mock of the service and verify consumers requirements with it. Marco will work on the database schema and performances. Consumers conversion may take the most time and will likely be an iterative process once the API and the service are complete, by the end of the third quarter. | ||
}} | |||
---- | |||
====<span style="color: green">Reduce impact of thumbnailing</span>==== | |||
{{PerfProject | |||
|impact={{desktop}} | |||
|team=Drew Willicox, Mark Hammond | |||
|duration= | |||
|goal=?? | |||
|reports= | |||
|work={{Bug|899401}} | |||
|dependencies= | |||
|notes= | |||
Ultimately we want to move all thumbnail capturing off the main thread, probably using the "background" thumbnailing service which landed in Fx 25 and uses a <browser remote="true"> (so the thumbnailing is done in a content process). This service currently uses the Private Browsing features, but declines to capture when a private browsing window is open, but can still have side-effects related to this (eg, if a capture is in-progress when PB mode is entered, it might cause cookies for a site to exist when they otherwise would not). We plan to avoid using PB mode once we have identified a technique to make these requests totally isolated. | |||
}} | }} | ||
---- | ---- | ||