WebAPI Meeting Details
- Tuesday 2014-06-10 - 8:00 am Pacific
- Dial-in: conference# 98413
- People with Mozilla phones or softphones please dial x92 Conf# 98413
- US/Toll-free: +1 800 707 2533, (pin 369) Conf# 98413 (max 48 users at any time)
- US/California/Mountain View: +1 650 903 0800, x92 Conf# 98413
- US/California/San Francisco: +1 415 762 5700, x92 Conf# 98413
- US/Oregon/Portland: +1 971 544 8000, x92 Conf# 98413
- CA/British Columbia/Vancouver: +1 778 785 1540, x92 Conf# 98413
- CA/Ontario/Toronto: +1 416 848 3114, x92 Conf# 98413
- UK/London: +44 (0)207 855 3000, x92 Conf# 98413
- FR/Paris: +33 1 84 88 37 37, x92 Conf# 98413
- sip:email@example.com or, for some clients, sip:firstname.lastname@example.org (may not work for all rooms)
- Gmail Chat (requires Flash and the Google Talk plugin): paste +1 650 903 0800 into the Gmail Chat box that doesn't look like it accepts phone numbers
- SkypeOut is free if you use the 800 number
- WebAPI Vidyo Room / London-Allo Allo / Toronto-Spadina
- Join irc.mozilla.org #webapi for back channel
Notes below archived from etherpad: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/webapi-meetingnotes
jedp - intend to implement navigator.requestSync and .unregisterSync
- We intend to write an intend-to-implement email to dev-webapi and dev-platform
- perfect. that is where the bulk of the discussion will happen (but it's great that we had the opportunity to discuss synchronously!)
- [jed] done: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.webapi/3LbVbgJgaIQ
- See: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Cloud_Services/FirefoxOS_Sync
- To implement: https://github.com/slightlyoff/BackgroundSync/blob/master/explainer.md
- "tell an application when it's a good time to sync"
- "alarm API + network status changes"
- any feedback on architecture of work in progress? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1018320#c8
- apart from implementing navigator.* in C++ (can't seem to add things to navigator object from JS), what else will we need to do in C++? (Exposing api to service worker through DOM?)
- will we be able to implement scheduler in JS?
- question: why not use fetch in service workers?
- assurances provided by system to app instead of relying on periodic sync
- may also provide ability for system to protect against malicious/errant apps
- question: why are you trying to use system messages?
- only a short-term goal until we have a shippable product
- basically awaiting shipping Service Workers
- there are partners needing an ability to wake themselves up and system messages achieve this for now
- can't expose system messages to the web
- turning this into a spec?
- annevk suggests emailing public-webapps with a formal proposal
- UX for user approval of app's intention to sync data? "may affect battery life"
- everything? when we move this away from system message wakeup mechanism, there will be an API change
- which is concerning about exposing this to an ecosystem of developers we don't have direct influence over
- when we're closer to landing this, let's re-evaluate moving to service workers, etc.
- concern: memory pressure + completion of a sync in a service worker?
- jedp: follow up with a list of apis we'll need in service workers and use cases
- start a separate email thread on these