Program Management/Programs/Silent Update/2011-11-17: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Removal of OS security dialog for Windows==
==Removal of OS security dialog for Windows==
Owner: Brian
Owner: Brian
* MAR file verification should be done this week
** will get releng the details they need this week
* Should only support WinXP and above
* Testing issues found on Vista and 2000
* Patches still require further review and refinement, nothing major


; QA (Simona Badau)
; QA (Simona Badau)
Line 42: Line 47:
==Background updates==
==Background updates==
Owner: Ehsan
Owner: Ehsan
* Implementation complete, ready for testing  
* Implementation complete, ready for testing
* Working on merging with Brian's patches, things seem to be progressing smoothly
 
; QA (Vlad Ghetiu)
* Complete
** [[Silent_Update_updater/TestPlan|Test plan]] is drafted
** Have been testing and writing test cases, consulting with Ehsan
* To Do
** Continue to test and implement tests
* Questions
** n/a


==New workflow for updating users with incompatible add-ons==
==New workflow for updating users with incompatible add-ons==
Owner: Rob, Chris
Owner: Rob, Chris
* Chris was to follow up with Alex Limi last week about the new button.
* Chris met with Limi and updated the wiki page with revised specs
* Limi will follow-up with UX specs shortly
* Once we move to add-ons default to compatible, the majority of incompatible add-ons will be ones with binary components
* Add-ons which are incompatible and the user decides to move forward with the update, we will only disable
* "not now" should suppress the dialog for X days, and not til the next Firefox update


; QA (Ioana Budnar)
; QA (Ioana Budnar)
Line 53: Line 72:
* To Do:
* To Do:
** Continue to revise test plan as feature develops
** Continue to revise test plan as feature develops
* Questions:
* Questions (answers above):
** Are the binary add-ons the only ones that should be listed in the prompt about unsupported add-ons?
** Are the binary add-ons the only ones that should be listed in the prompt about unsupported add-ons?
** When the user chooses to continue with the update and ignore the incompatible add-ons, are those add-ons simply disabled, or are they removed from Firefox?
** When the user chooses to continue with the update and ignore the incompatible add-ons, are those add-ons simply disabled, or are they removed from Firefox?
Line 60: Line 79:
=Getting the word out=
=Getting the word out=
* Ehsan's blog post was published on [http://ehsanakhgari.org/blog/2011-11-11/updating-firefox-background his blog] and on [http://blog.mozilla.com/futurereleases/2011/11/12/updating-firefox-in-the-background/ The Future of Firefox Blog].
* Ehsan's blog post was published on [http://ehsanakhgari.org/blog/2011-11-11/updating-firefox-background his blog] and on [http://blog.mozilla.com/futurereleases/2011/11/12/updating-firefox-in-the-background/ The Future of Firefox Blog].
=Other=
= Other =
; QA (ashughes)
* How has the interaction been compared to recent weeks?
** Consensus is that the dev/QA interaction has definitely improved.
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
496

edits