Participation/Projects/Leadership toolkit/Content Development Standards: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:
# Content is developed using best practices, and submitted for QA review.   
# Content is developed using best practices, and submitted for QA review.   
# Content is approved and posted to website, but website administrator.
# Content is approved and posted to website, but website administrator.
# Content is tested by working group team member in their community.
# Content is iterated-on based on feedback from initial testing, and assessment + surveys built into content.

Latest revision as of 22:29, 14 December 2016

Please find the most recent copy of standards, workflow and templates for content development in this document.

Workflow

  1. Mozilla team requests skill resource.
  2. An issue is opened on Github.
  3. Github issue is assigned to content developer, who then proposes learning outcomes and other details via content template.
  4. Mozilla team reviews proposed content & approves or returns with feedback for another iteration.
  5. Content is developed using best practices, and submitted for QA review.
  6. Content is approved and posted to website, but website administrator.
  7. Content is tested by working group team member in their community.
  8. Content is iterated-on based on feedback from initial testing, and assessment + surveys built into content.