Education/Projects/JetpackForLearning/Criteria: Difference between revisions
< Education | Projects | JetpackForLearning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '==Logistics== * 6 minutes per presentation * 2 minutes quick feedback after each presentation * Each of the six judge chooses three top projects (1st, 2nd, 3rd) * Community vot…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ==Presentation and Voting== | ||
* 6 minutes per presentation | * 6 minutes per presentation | ||
** Focus on use case | |||
** Demo the Jetpack | |||
** Include future plans for Jetpack development and dissemination | |||
** If components of the project were built outside of the Design Challenge, clearly identify them - judging will be done on the basis of the Design Challenge relevant work. | |||
* 2 minutes quick feedback after each presentation | * 2 minutes quick feedback after each presentation | ||
* Each of the six judge chooses three top projects (1st, 2nd, 3rd) | * Each of the six judge chooses three top projects (1st, 2nd, 3rd) | ||
* Community vote: The Design Challenge participants also vote. Opinions are aggregated and count like a 7th judge. | * Community vote: The Design Challenge participants also vote. Opinions are aggregated and count like a 7th judge. | ||
==Judging Criteria== | ==Judging Criteria== | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 11 March 2010
Presentation and Voting
- 6 minutes per presentation
- Focus on use case
- Demo the Jetpack
- Include future plans for Jetpack development and dissemination
- If components of the project were built outside of the Design Challenge, clearly identify them - judging will be done on the basis of the Design Challenge relevant work.
- 2 minutes quick feedback after each presentation
- Each of the six judge chooses three top projects (1st, 2nd, 3rd)
- Community vote: The Design Challenge participants also vote. Opinions are aggregated and count like a 7th judge.
Judging Criteria
Quality of the idea
- “Interestingness” - Will people want to use this?
- Potential reach and impact – Size of the audience
- Potential to promote Jetpack / Browser technology for education
Quality of the implementation
- Is everything working? Is it ready for the real world?
- What is the quality of the user experience?
- Extensibility of the Jetpack
Additional points for:
- Participation in the Design Challenge seminars, mailing list, and Design Camp
- Demonstration of open source development best practices
- Code quality (documentation, clarity, etc.)