MailNews:Performance Testing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Tinderbox numbers are now on a separate page.) |
(Add link to perf discussion) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
See also [[MailNews:Automated Testing]]. | See also [[MailNews:Automated Testing]]. | ||
[[MailNews:Performance Testing:Meeting 2008 01 09|Recent discussion on Performance tests for Thunderbird (2008/01/09)]] | |||
== MailNews Tinderbox Tests == | == MailNews Tinderbox Tests == | ||
Revision as of 12:26, 13 January 2009
Performance testing for MailNews (i.e. Thunderbird and the Mail/Newsgroups part of SeaMonkey) is becoming more important. We need to track this performance and any regressions that our changes make, especially with some of the big changes that are currently being proposed.
This page and its sub-pages are intended to describe the tests that are run (or will be run) on the tinderboxes and where the results go.
See also MailNews:Automated Testing.
Recent discussion on Performance tests for Thunderbird (2008/01/09)
MailNews Tinderbox Tests
Note: MailNews here refers to either Thunderbird, or the Mail/Newsgroups/Address Book part of SeaMonkey